1/7/2023 0 Comments Double commander for gentoo![]() So I use MC, but tbh it is awful and doesn't come close to Total Commander: background operation are awful, builtin viewer (F3) is awful, archive integration is both buggy and slow etc. That was cool, but I just can't stand KDE for its slowness, crashes and looking like shit. I remember KDE file managers could even show you background operations running through a tray icon and you could even pause/resume/cancel them there. Where managers like MC suck is running file operations in background: they cannot properly start, restart, cancel or track file operations like GUI managers do. After building the image when you run the container, run docker run -p 5000:5000 name. ![]() When running container, to bind ports specify -p option. They also make it more convenient to switch from console to GUI if you need to run something there. Command EXPOSE in your Dockerfile lets you bind containers port to some port on the host machine but it doesnt do anything else. The advantage of MC and other managers for terminals is that they work over SSH, so if you need to access remote machine without GUI, you can still have your favorite file manager there. The only one that was close to being usable was Gnome Commander, but it once crashed during copying/moving and lost some of my files, so I ditched it.įor me it is mostly about file manager with side panes - they are just better at everything. In that case you should have no problem providing a single concrete example of the supposed advantages.īack in my Windows days I used Total Commander for everything, but on Linux I switched to MC simply because there were no good double pane managers. This all available in good double pane file manager and likely works better than in MC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |